The shooting competition is divided into four types: rifle, pistol, moving target and flying saucer. Each type varies according to gun specification, shooting posture, shooting distance, shooting method and target type, and is divided into more items. At present, the international shooting league has announced that there are 42 men's projects in the world record and 14 women (see attached table). The world record, however, stipulates that only records created in world events, games and continents will be recognized. The shooting competition is divided into individual and group competitions. The number of team competitions in each project is divided into four men and three women. The league is ranked by the sum of individual achievements. The international shooting league has set up 52 men and women in the world shooting championships. The intercontinental shooting championship is about the same as the world championships. The Asian shooting championships currently do not include large calibre rifles and mobile target. The Olympic Games have only men's events, but women can sign up to compete with men. There are seven shooting items in the 22nd Olympic Games. There are only individual competitions and no group projects. The 23rd Olympic Games scheduled to be held in 1984 will increase the men's air rifle competition and include three women's projects in the Olympic Games for the first time. Thereafter, the women will not compete in the men's events except the flying saucer program. In addition to the international uniform competition, many countries also have their own traditional competitions. Countries such as the United States, Japan and other countries still hold the old shooting match of the old preloaded rope gun. Britain's traditional hunting game is shooting a variety of analog prey, such as pheasant, water ducks, rabbits, etc., the target suddenly appeared from the hidden point, striker must discover the target, rapid fire to win. Sweden, the Soviet union and other countries also have simulated duel shooting matches. Ms Stephens continues: “The new extension has provided a fantastic and really flexible space that thanks to the new PURe® patio doors and windows, can be enjoyed whatever the weather. It’s great to be able to open up the living space and enjoy the close access we now have to the garden but even when the blustery weather that we are so familiar with here in the Yorkshire Dales takes hold, the glazing has provided us with a peaceful and cosy retreat. It’s the perfect space for both work and relaxation and I couldn’t be happier!” The significance of work to society and the development and progress of society are closely related to the selection tendency of members of each society. Many countries, developed or underdeveloped, have struggled to solve the issue of electoral malpractice for years. The situation continues to be worsened from the advancement of technology through which computer hackers can manipulate the voting machines and gain comfortable access to confidential voting material to influence the results of the elections. To avenge their unfair defeat, some legislators have resorted to using law to their own hands through guerilla wars and civil disobedience. Although some freedom fighters have succeeded in overthrowing dictatorial regimes with the barrel from the gun, bloodshed and violence shouldn't be used as bargaining chips in the future political negotiations. When the war happens, innocent females and kids are the ones who carry the heavy burdens. Those who turn to cruelty after their defeat expose their true character: they aren't enthusiastic about serving their people; their predisposition to ruthlessness implies that their ambitions to offer their constituents are impelled by their personal and political self interests. Here are the eleven commandants for winning after the unfair lack of an election: In the face of market failure, coase has given the opposite answer: external-utility problems can be solved by explicitly using the market, without government intervention. And zhang wuchang is more absolute, he said that there is no so-called external utility, there is only unclear property rights. Anyway, coase brought revolutionary innovation to market concepts. He made it clear that the key to the market was not the "price mechanism" of impersonal machinery, but the power of participants in economic activity (property rights)