how is retained earnings calculated
Back to Top

how is retained earnings calculated

The company's chief executive and chairman Venkat Meenavalli media interview said: "the ultra high current market valuation is not reasonable and not real, we put the ipo pricing valuation for $5 is a very good description." But he emphasised: "we are a profitable company that has nothing to do with the current digital currency frenzy. Longfin has grown at a rapid rate of 200 per cent over the past six months and earned a profit of $28m. Someone asked: "is value subjective or objective?" In fact, the formulation of this question does not accord with dialectical materialism. Because if that value is an objective rather than subjective, which he said is equal to the value only from the objective existence of its form, without subjective reflection of form and at the same time, the or value of the objective things can't be human understanding, that an agnostic mire; On the contrary, if think value is subjective, not objective, it is said that only a reflection of its subjective value form, rather than the form of the objective and at the same time, the value is entirely subjective since birth, not the reflection of objective things, which in turn into a mire of idealism. The accounting income follows the historical cost principle and the matching principle, which is conducive to the objective reflection of the business management responsibility of the enterprise management authorities. But, due to the historical cost principle inherent defects, especially according to the present value of revenue and expenses by historical cost line, makes the calculation of accounting earnings lack of inner logical unity, and the matching principle is difficult to carry out, so that the book value of assets can not reflect its real value, cost cannot be fully compensated. And the economic benefit is measured in the current value, which reflects the actual value of the asset, which is beneficial to the full compensation of the cost. “Historically, reducing emissions has simply meant financial penalties for industry – which creates conflict between government and business. But British Glass firmly believed that sectors which took advantage of this opportunity to influence government strategy stood to reduce costs, develop resilience on energy pricing and gain a competitive edge over businesses that didn’t become green economy leaders.